By: Anne Nelson, Extension educator & Paulo Pagliari, Extension nutrient management specialist
In recent years, biostimulants have sparked an interest with many crop producers. With these products getting more attention, we find there is much to debate on their effectiveness. Before we discuss whether Extension recommends them, let’s talk about the different types and what they actually do.
What are biostimulants?
A legal definition of biostimulants has yet to be decided. However, the European Biostimulants Industry Council describes them as “Substances and/or microorganisms whose function when applied to plants or the rhizosphere is to stimulate natural processes to benefit nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency tolerance to abiotic stress, and/or crop quality, independently of its nutrient content.”
There are many categories of biostimulants. The most popular are humic acids, seaweed extracts, liquid manure composting and beneficial bacteria and fungi.
There are many categories of biostimulants. The most popular are humic acids, seaweed extracts, liquid manure composting and beneficial bacteria and fungi.
- Humic and fulvic acids – parts of soil organic matter resulting from the decomposition of plant, animal, and microbial residues.
- e.g. peat, mineral deposits of leonardite and soft coal
- Dark in color
- Can increase the cation exchange capacity
- Seaweed Extracts
- Derived through different extraction processes.
- Soluble powders or liquid.
- Liquid manure composting
- Made by mixing manure water and a blend of proprietary materials thought to feed specific bacteria in the manure. This provides adequate conditions for microbial growth. The liquid is then used as a biofertilizer.
- Beneficial bacteria and fungi – concentration of bacteria and/or fungi in the soil that help with root growth.
- E.g. Bacillus and Rhizobium fungi
- Majority of products marketed toward large scale commercial agriculture
What does the research say?
Most data on these products is for high value horticultural crops instead of a corn/soybean system. However, research at the University of Minnesota has shown that in most cases those products are ineffective and do not live up to the expectation. For example, the products thought to increase enzyme activity rarely do compared with plots that did not receive the treatment. Products thought to provide better overall growing conditions and increase grain yield also do not show any improvements when compared to untreated.
Recommendations
When thinking about using these products we recommend doing a replicated strip trial before integrating them into your entire operation. To see these products make a difference and pay for themselves, consider contacting a local or regional Extension educator, or your crop adviser to help you set up a trial and interpret the results.
Additional resources:
- Podcast episode: Nitrogen-fixing biological products: Four Midwest experts weigh in on industry claims, on-farm research tips, and more (June 2024)
- Nitrogen-fixing biological products: New report summarizes research from across the Corn Belt (April 2023)
- Webinar recap: Biologicals for corn and soybeans (February 2023)
- Compendium of Research Reports on Use of Non-Traditional Materials for Crop Production
- U of M fertilizer recommendations by crop
---
For the latest nutrient management information, subscribe to the Nutrient Management Podcast wherever you listen and never miss an episode! And don't forget to subscribe to the Minnesota Crop News daily or weekly email newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube channel, like UMN Extension Nutrient Management on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and visit our website.
Comments
Post a Comment