Skip to main content

How does integrating cover crops and liquid-injected manure impact corn yield and cover crop biomass?

Farmer taking biomass samples

By: Manuel Sabbagh, graduate research assistant, & Melissa Wilson, Extension manure management specialist

Key Points

  • Interseeding cover crops produces greater biomass than drilling cover crops after harvest.
  • In rotations where corn follows corn (sweet corn or silage), late fall application of manure (when soils are below 50°F but prior to freezing) sustains or improves yield compared to spring-applied fertilizer.

What we did

The objectives of this study were multi-faceted. First, we wanted to explore various cover crop planting methods and planting times in order to have consistency in cover crop establishment and keep the soil covered year-round. Second, we wanted to see if cover crops can retain nutrients from fall-applied liquid-injected manure, even if the manure was injected a little earlier in the fall than we usually recommend. (Typically, we recommend injecting manure when soil temperatures cool down to 50°F or below.) Lastly, we wanted to measure the effects that integrating liquid-injected manure and cover crops have on soil health, nutrient cycling, and agronomic production.
stand of corn in Waseca
Research plot in Waseca, MN.

Three small plot studies were initiated in 2019 that comprised of three different cropping rotations:
  1. Continuous silage corn in Morris, MN: A winter rye/annual ryegrass cover crop mix was either interseeded at the 4th leaf collar stage (V4), overseeded at the kernel dent stage (R5), or drilled after harvest in mid-September. Then, liquid dairy manure was injected into each cover crop planting combination in late September/early October or late October/early November, before and after soil temperatures had cooled to or below 50°F.
  2. Soybean followed by corn in Morris and Waseca, MN: A winter rye/annual ryegrass mix was overseeded near the time of leaf drop in September or it was drilled after soybean harvest. Since the soybeans weren’t harvested until mid-October, we only injected swine manure in late fall (late October/early November) once the soil temperature was below 50°F.
  3. Sweet corn followed by grain corn in Waseca, MN: Winter rye, oats, or a winter rye/oat/radish mix was drilled after sweet corn harvest in mid-August. Similar to the continuous corn rotation, liquid swine manure was injected in mid- to late-September or late October/early November.
Each of the three systems had plots that did not have cover crops, manure, and neither cover or manure. Plots with no manure application received urea in the spring prior to corn planting. Manure was applied using a nitrogen-based rate to meet corn nitrogen demand, subtracting 40 pounds of N that was applied at planting through starter fertilizer. Urea was applied at similar N rates to manure to meet corn nitrogen demand. Data was pooled across two growing seasons for each system. This two-year field study was completed in fall 2021.


What did we find?

Continuous Silage Corn
  • Prior to the first frost in fall, non-manured plots had significantly greater cover crop biomass than the manured plots but in spring, cover crop biomass was similar in plots that had manure or no manure.
  • Applying dairy manure in early or late fall had significantly higher silage yield than spring-applied fertilizer.
  • Overseeding cover crops at R5 was more successful at producing increased cover crop biomass, whereas interseeding at V4 produced higher silage yields compared to the other cover cropped plots.
  • There were no significant differences in silage yield when comparing plots that did or did not have a cover crop planted in fall prior to corn planting.
Soybean-Grain Corn
  • Fall cover crop biomass was significantly greater when overseeded near soybean leaf drop compared to drilling after harvest. However, within each of those planting methods, there was no difference in biomass production between manure and no manure.
  • Spring 2020 cover crop biomass followed a similar trend to fall data. However, in spring 2021, overseeding near leaf drop with no manure application produced greater cover crop biomass than overseeding with manure and drilling after harvest, with or without manure.
  • Corn grain yield did not differ between manure or spring-applied fertilizer or among the cover crop treatments, including no cover crop.
Sweet Corn-Grain Corn
    manure applicator sweep injecting manure
    Manure applicator sweep injecting manure.
  • Cover crop biomass production was similar across cover crop types in fall regardless of whether manure was applied or not.
  •  In spring 2020, cover crop biomass was just as high or higher in manured plots compared to non-manured plots, with single-species rye producing greater biomass than the mixture.
  • In spring 2021, plots with early fall manure application consistently had greater biomass than non-manured plots and late fall manure application with no consistent effect of cover crop type.
  • Early fall application of liquid swine manure reduced corn yield compared with spring fertilizer application by 6.5% on average. Late fall manure application increased yield by 13.2% in 2020 and had similar yield to spring fertilizer plots in 2021 (a dry year).
  • Cover crops that survived the winter resulted in a small grain yield penalty (19-20 bu/acre) compared to no cover crops.
Overall, overseeding near plant senescence is a more optimal time to plant cover crops than drilling after harvest or planting near early crop development. Overseeding gives cover crops more time to grow compared to drilling after harvest while also providing enough sunlight exposure to produce more cover crop biomass compared to interseeding before canopy closure. The growing season in 2021 was drier than 2020, which may explain the reduced yields between the first and second year of the study. Manure has been shown to be a reliable nutrient source compared to synthetic fertilizer when applied in the fall after soil temperatures have cooled; this may be especially important due to the recent rise in synthetic fertilizer costs.

What's next?

Soil samples from both years of the study are currently being analyzed for nutrient content and various soil health parameters. Analysis of cover crop and corn samples are underway to measure their nutrient content. All of this will hopefully show us how the integration of liquid-injected manure and cover crops impact soil health, nutrient cycling, and agronomic production. Information from this project will allow us to develop best management practices for integrating liquid-injected manure and cover crops into cropping systems in the upper Midwest.

mixture of cereal rye and annual ryegrass that was overseeded
Mixture of cereal rye and annual ryegrass cover crop that was overseeded.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Conservation Innovation Grants program at the Natural Resources Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (grant number 2020-68008-31410), the Minnesota Corn Research and Promotion Council, and the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research.

---

For the latest nutrient management information, subscribe to the Minnesota Crop News email newsletter, like UMN Extension Nutrient Management on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and visit our website.

Support for Minnesota Crop News nutrient management blog posts is provided in part by Minnesota's fertilizer tonnage fee through the Agricultural Fertilizer Research & Education Council (AFREC). Learn more at MNsoilfertility.com

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments